Call of Duty '7' Hits November 2010

the only reason y they wont make MW3 right away because they want MW2 to grow and vietnam would be a SWEEEETTT subject to focus on

WHO THE HELL CARES about Treyarch and COD7....I cant wait for the DLC Map Packs for MW2.....Im sure these new maps are going to be super kick ass.

Discuss all Call of Duty at ***n00b weblink removed*** thanks.

Whats wrong with expressing our opinions on this site? Stop promoting your website and if you dont have anything to say to add to this, then dont.

@Leo it's not that infinity ward is looking to the future, they are just crafty and know that WW2 shooters are a dead gaming form. i suggest that treyarch make a game thats a bit more on the stealthy side, like a lot of the special ops and SAS levels in MW1&2, expect place it in cold war russia. they love older stuff, but new vietnam levels and older ww2 japan levels would just blend together, but the espionage and class of the mid 70's would be not so much as a brand new taste, but it's something that hasn't really been covered when it comes to first person shooters. think call of duty controls, but with a metal gear solid 3 era feel.

and as far as inifinity ward not making MW3, thats so stupid of them. it's a hit franchise, and they can really market it cause Price and Soap can be marketable faces. soap and price could be the new Master chief and cortana. plus the games are just plain fun, and offer an amazing sense if cinamatical wonder. all they need to do is just make campaigns that are twice as long. nobody wants to pay 60 bucks for a 5 hour game, and the rest multiplayer.

@matlock: I agree. I dont think there is an overwhleming advantage or even an advantage to making WW2 or other old war games. A more modern feel to anything is best, IMO. Kids these days are rev'd up on the NOW/Future. A lot of them are fascinated with "cool weapons" so I think thats where Treyarch makes their mistakes. If Treyarch decides to make something "old" although it could be fun, it wont have the same impact that MW1 & 2 have had on the youth and everyone else.

a new game by infinity ward was great, but if is treyarch who will take the new call of duty, i think thats gonna be cool....but a mw3 was better i think.infinity ward just rock's..but thats real, a new MW3 wiil cost a lot cause the new weapons, for pay military.. u no what? just wait for the new call of duty,,,maybe its gonna be betterthan mw2....sry for bad english im portuguese...

@TRF: No. I said that there are (IN REAL LIFE, not a video game) super weapons that are invented and tested every year to which the US military will not ever see, because those weapons are really expensive to supply our troops with....even though they are way better than what they have now. I said that Infinity Ward should consider checking out some of those super weapons, and incorporate them into their next game, whether it be MW3 or not.

As we should probably ALL KNOW, Treyarch is making the next one (COD7). From my understanding, it started with their first one on PC and then COD2 it was Infinity Ward; COD3 was Treyarch; COD4 was Infinity Ward; COD5 was Treyarch, and COD6 was Infinity Ward. Its obvious they are alternating between the two game makers.....I THINK though, that Infinity Ward should branch off and do their own thing and make games EVERY YEAR.

Treyarch Fails at making games. They fail even after they take Infinityward's game engine. W@W= s**t cod3=S**T cod1= S**T. Infinityward makes the best games. Robert Bowling is the man. Cod7 is going to = W@W no difference besides map pack and a new s**tty nazi zombies

Well, I will say however, that even though I personally didnt enjoy W@W, it wasnt a "terrible" game. The thing W@W didnt have was that "FUN FACTOR" to which MW1 & MW2 have. Trust me. I played all of them. W@W was fun for 15 minutes. Then I went back to MW1.

Well, I will say however, that even though I personally didnt enjoy W@W, it wasnt a "terrible" game. The thing W@W didnt have was that "FUN FACTOR" to which MW1 & MW2 have. Trust me. I played all of them. W@W was fun for 15 minutes. Then I went back to MW1.

Whats with the stupid idiots that decide to play Hardcore Team Deathmatch and start "team killing???"

And what about you stupid idiots that dont pay attention to the map or where the enemy is firing from to which gets your entire team slaughtered?

And finally, whats with the stupid M.F.r's who wait til a TEAMmate drops a care package, only to kill them and steal his TEAMmates care package????? WTF is wrong with you dumbasses??? (Again all of these questions come from playing HARDCORE Team Deathmatch)

1 thing a ask for::::......modern warfare 3 with the same style of MW2, the only thing we can do:: wait for it... infiniy ward make the best call of duty ever...COD. 5 was really cool, but mw2 perfect... i dont know how they will make one better, xD but we will see the result

I think MW3 should have the best things about COD4 and MW2 COMBINED. COD4 was amazing, it played superbly. MW2 however, i think doesn't play as good but it is great fun and has its own greatness. The developers should take the qualities of each game, along with new things and mix it all together and create Modern Warfare 3. What do u guys think?

this is all true but cod4 mods lock is crap, gotta get rid of it make the game back to his old ways the good old days