PlayStation 3 Pad a Double-Bluff?

> News Comments > SPOnG Comments Index

Topic started: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:56
Click here to view the news article this topic refers to.
Page:«12
Shinji
Joined 27 Jun 2005
8 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:56
Kutaragi: "Oh, that beast? Just kidding! Here's our REAL controller: it's shaped like a television remote and can detect 3D movements in space, how far it is from the television and twist!"

Gaming Public: "Oh, my God! Brilliant! Can't believe no one's thought of it yet!"
ann0uk
Joined 26 Jan 2005
101 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:14
That would not surprise me.
majin dboy
Joined 27 May 2005
745 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:39
imagine the hand crampage.i think i saw the PS3 controller on my weekly visit to Anne Summers.
OptimusP
Joined 13 Apr 2005
1174 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:40
Lol, i can see it now...the new PS3-controller is .... dual remotes each armed with dual analog sticks!! ahaaa! beat that!

Seriously, Nintendo's remote is so heavily patented that any device that remotely can simulate a tenth of theirs and is applied to gaming Nintendo can sue that company for patent infringement.

I'm betting on a controller that has 3 analog sticks or one that uses dual tocuhscreens or something else very cookydoodle.
majin dboy
Joined 27 May 2005
745 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:45
or maybe they will just use the classic playstion controller,lets face it dosnt deserve a new controller
OptimusP
Joined 13 Apr 2005
1174 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:30
Well actually their classic design can be sued for patent infringement by Immersion, that's why they changed it so they can't sue them.
tyrion
Joined 14 Oct 1999
1786 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:35
OptimusP wrote:
Well actually their classic design can be sued for patent infringement by Immersion, that's why they changed it so they can't sue them.

Only the rumble tech is in question, and then only in the US. The actual design shape is OK.
realvictory
Joined 9 Nov 2005
634 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:03
OptimusP wrote:
Lol, i can see it now...the new PS3-controller is .... dual remotes each armed with dual analog sticks!! ahaaa! beat that!


Haha! This wouldn't surprise me at all!!

I'm expecting something not very different to the PS2 controller. Of course, it will be wireless. It probably will have some tilt sensors or something in it, to either attempt to compete with the Revolution, or even have s**te ports.

I don't believe it will be a totally new controller, though, or that different from the old ones. It's quite funny, though, because what I love about sony is their "vision", yet their controller never improves ("changes", for fanboys)!
Greg2k
Joined 28 Feb 2005
107 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:54
I guess the Dual Shock 3 will be wireless and will definitely have triggers instead of L2 and R2. The Dual Shock is a pretty well-known controller, so they probably won't change it that much. If anything, they may accomodate the handles to suit the left analog stick; it's understandable that it wasn't placed where the Dpad currently is on the original Dual Shock, but with the PS2 pushing 3D gaming, they could have changed it for the current version.
I'll Eat Your Soul
Joined 5 Jul 2004
48 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:37
Think about it... the DS allowed an intuitive "touch" interface. It's big brother, the Revolution, has an intuitive interface that builds on the touch principle.

Equally, the PSP has FAR TOO BLOODY MANY RACING GAMES, perhaps the PS3 is going to have FAR TOO BLOODY MANY RACING GAMES and thus the semi-steering wheel shape indicates the most common function for the thing.
Joji
Joined 12 Mar 2004
3960 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:59
All Sony need to do is tweak the design, but to be honest perhaps we'd be happy enough if they left it be.

They'd best steer clear of a similar Rev design or they'll get panned by the gaming press, bigtime.
soanso
Joined 20 Dec 2004
267 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:55
If Sony are saying that now, then I think they've taken one look at the revo controller and what it is capable of (the potential, I don't know if it actually works or not but we'll see) and thought to themselves "Oh *#$“¥!!"
Quick redesing and some pr later....
fluffstardx
Joined 20 May 2004
633 comments
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:28
Just a thought, but...

Maybe the next pad will actually DO WHAT IT SAYS IT CAN. You know, analogue buttons with working analogue sensing (what PS2 games used it? And how good was it? Exactly...), Bluetooth that doesn't get confused and send porn to your phone...
way
Joined 10 Jun 2005
214 comments
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:21
Actually the new design looks like this:

_I""I_

The old curved design plus handles out each side, on the bottom. To fire you simple grab the new patented handles to activate the new patented firing process, by using them to swing the main body up banging your forehead, repeatedly ;).

No seriously, Nintendo fans, that was a joke ;).

As far as the Revolution controller goes, isn't patenting getting ridiculous! I had that idea years ago for one of my designs. Back in the mid 80's I remember an advert for a mouse replacement for the Mac, that detected where your head was aimed at on screen. You had to wear the emitter on your head. This sort of system was latter available to play PC games in the 90's. Going back many years before, has anybody heard of the light gun? Then there were the tilt joysticks (I had one in early 80's, that used mercury switches). You had gyros, and now you have Segway's motion detector on a chip. Yet, some how, I think Sony will be given problems if it uses any of these techniques in a controller, with a patent like this running around.

There is an easier way to do 3D games, I have an old design around here myself that I have just been refining, suitable for PS3 and Gameboy like machines.
config
Joined 3 Sep 1999
2088 comments
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:36
OptimusP wrote:
Seriously, Nintendo's remote is so heavily patented that any device that remotely can simulate a tenth of theirs and is applied to gaming Nintendo can sue that company for patent infringement.


Really? I can't see anything in the Revo controller that hasn't already been patented by other companies. I'm fairly confident that much of the Revo control uses licensed technologies; outside of exclusivity clauses between Nintendo and licensee, what's to stop Sony doing the same?
<< Prev12

Log-in or register to permanently change your layout setting.