Gates Confirms Xbox 360 Media Hub

So, if I already own a computer, why the f@#$ should I buy another one..?

Because this overpriced piece of crap needs to have other functions to warrant the $400 price tag. Furthermore, not everyone has a PC or a PC with a top-of-the line video card, sound card, and processor with 512 ram.

Its not a bad idea since it will allow for Super HDTV - 1080p and presumably it will make it alot easier to transfer your video and audio from your pc to your 360.

I have a bad feeling about media centers. Sure they are handy at some point but there like a dozens competitors with a different (and mostly better) plan out there.
I got a uncle and he has this killer multi-media hub where he can connect everything from a PC to a TV, surround sound system to a bloody tapeplayer of the sixties, if MS is aiming for those people...give up MS they allready have their dreammachine. And this is only one example of the many competitors MS will be facing. Form national cable companies to electronics companies and gamecompanies... no one ever in history won a multi-front war even if they were the richest of their time.

Well essentially a lot of early (japanese) PS2 sales were attributed to the fact that it was not just a games console but that it was a DVD player too.

I think it's a pretty shrewd move on MS's part to introduce an all in one media centre system to the mass market.

I know, in my case, when I modded my vannilla xbox and installed xbmc it pretty much turned into the defacto place were I play all my mp3s and ripped movies from.
That functionality/connectivity was a complete eye opener for me and for the rest of the family because it opened up the dark arts world of PC media playing to them.

I don't know much about MS's brand of media centre but if it has the same functionality (or the potential for other people to give it the same functionality) of xbmc then it should be pretty revolutionary [to bring this to a mass market].

Nintendo is right in that next gen consoles shouldn't be all about sheer power (although ,saying that, power should be a given already) but where Nin is talking about diversity, seperation and gaming innovation; the direction of other consumer entertainment companies is all about convergence.

DVD video - movies - is mass market. Put in the disc, enjoy.

I personally don't believe that an MP3/DVD/CD player with hamstrung web browsing is mass market.

If it had a built-in cable/satellite TV decoder and PVR software and a decent wireless input device, then we might be talking.

As it stands, media centres/hubs are still impenetrable and unfathomable to the docile "mass market", including the "casual gamer" segment.

Ideally, within the next 5-10 years, we'll see a market split. With Sony and Microsoft becoming all in one media centers to compete with current day PCs. Meanwhile, there will be a specialty market consisting of Nintendo and maybe even Sega, producing niche specialty titles and machines that provide experiences that a media PCDVDGameTVCD center cant provide. Consolidation, contrary to popular belief, connot be the future entirely. We will always see convergences occuring, because as things age and progress this type of action is more likely. However, fresh new ideas, in any sense of the word, will always exist in one way or another. Your Xbox will replace your PC, but will your PC ever replace a game console?

Absolultey config but it's the connectivity to the PC [used as a media storage unit] that is exciting for me.

Most of my media is stored on the PC and when I use that media in conjunction with my mod'ed xbox and xbmc (xbox media centre) it opens that media and the media available on the net (like Yahoo Launch Music Videos and Apple Trailers) to my entire family and anyone else who can drive a joypad.

The way it works now is that I put movies/music on my xbox or on my pc and the xbox connects to imdb/cddb and grabs indepth information from that source and makes it viewable on the xbox (using imdb posters or user created images as a thumbnail) so now I can search my movies (and music) by genre/year/actor/album etc. and I can connect to Launch and stream music videos or Apple and stream internet trailers through the TV all through a very easy to use ui.
You can do that using your PC sure but for me the PC (as a personal computer) is still too personal and a private thing (I don't want loads of jokers messing with my PC and taking up valuable PC time) not to mention that while explaining codecs to the average joe you can actually see the precise second their eyes glaze over.

As I said I am not too familiar with how MS's flavour of media centre handles codecs and formats but if it is as good as xbmc (probably not although xbmc is based on the functionality of MSmc) then that's pretty exciting and a fantastic usp when shown to other people.

Spong, you guys really can't pass by an opportunity to vent your hatred of MS, can you? Post a link, showing exactly where a MS spokesperson stated that no future iteration of the xbox console would ever have media centre capabilities. I'll make it easy for you. YOU'RE FULL OF S**T. When MS made those statements they were referring to the current gen xbox console ONLY.

Really, I can't see why anybody except an MS hater would see these features as a negative for the console.
* They are all software features, so add minimally to the cost of development, and therefore the cost of the console.
* If you're a user who has no interest in the features, then buy the hard drive free version, or simply do not use them.
* I, and many other geek types currently use a media center type pc in our lounge right now, to play divx movies, mp3's, etc in the lounge on the big tv... I for one would be more than happy to be able to remove that piece of hardware from my lounge if the xbox can perform those functions, as I believe would many many others.

Really, it would be nice if you guys made some attempt to maintain the illusion of objectivity, given that you purport to be a "news" site. Your news is much like Fox in the US, who subversively put opinion and political comment into stories they claim as news.

This is true, sort of. But it so doesn't need to be.

TiVo 2 can connect to a Mac to play iTunes and iPhoto libraries on a TV, and it's so easy I could use it. A device like that with HDTV output, DiVX capability and a Web Browser (it's Linux based, so FireFox would prolly go on their quite easily) would be the foolproof MediaCentre we all want and need. Apple should just buy Tivo, and get on with it...

But the real hurdle to Media Centre penetration in most of the world is that Murdoch "News" Corp runs cable/satellite. And without an integrated CAM (Conditional Access Module), no media centre is ever a real, one box, solution.

Murdoch will get into bed with someone soon - it will probably be Microsoft. "We love you Big Brother!" Learn it, memorise it, practice it. Because when that day comes, you'll need it!

They are not negative for the console. They are not negative for Microsoft.

They are negative for freedom of speech, independance of software producers (music, movies, and games), diversity and quality of software, for free market competition, for innovation and individuality.



Fox does that, and pretends that it doesn't (which you acknowledge by your use of the word subversively). SPOnG makes no attempt to hide its agenda or political leanings.

It explains its position, and reveals its reasons for holding that position. Fox patronises, SPOnG educates.

But where, exactly, does SPOnG purport to be a "news site"? It claims, as far as I can see, to be a community site that has news. That doesn't hold it to some higher journalistic ideals entirely of your imagining. All "news" outlets have an opinion and an agenda, it's just that most hide them in order to try and fool you, and SPOnG reveals its in order to try and engage you directly.

SPOnG wants to make you think, not tell you how to think. If you find people having ideas that differ from your so threatening, maybe you should stick to IGN.

Imagine this world...

Your Microsoft alarm clock wakes you up in the morning.

You plug your e-paper into your Microsoft Xbox 3 and download the lastest news direct from Microsoft.

You make a note in your Microsoft PDA to talk to your work mate via Microsoft MSN Messenger on your Microsoft Windows PC.

You travel to work in your car powered by Microsoft Navigation.

At work, you use Microsoft Office and send your work electronicaly using the Microsoft server.

On your way home you download a Microsoft Windows Media format song and play it on your Microsoft PDA. At home, you turn on your Microsoft Xbox 3 TV tuner and transfer your WMA song to your Xbox.

Ater watching TV with free personalised adverts from Microsoft you listen to your WMA file, after which it expires and you have to pay Microsoft to re-activate it. You might feel like buying a watch-once film from the MSN Movie store.

Before going to bed you check your Microsoft Hotmail email wirelessly and find another selection of new services offered by Microsoft. Microsoft have automatically subscribed you to the new services.

Luckily, all your entertainment needs are grouped together in a single, easy-to-pay subscription from Microsoft.

And Cell was designed for what exactly?

You can already wake up to your Sony alarm clock, look at your texts on your Sony phone, check your Sony Clié PDA for tasks to do, check email on your Sony Vaio, listen to your music on your Sony stereo/Walkman/Discman/Minidisc player/network walkman/PSP, play games on your PS2... the only difference is they don't own the software, YET. And Cell was deigned to link them all, just like Media Centre XP was designed to remove them all. Difference is, Microsoft will let anyone make their stuff, and they own your home life and your mobile/PDA (SPV phones, natch).

So let's get this clear: THEY ALL WANT TO DO IT. It's just MS have been more open about it. So will people PLEASE stop using that damn argument?

None of "them" have been open about wanting to rule your world and your access to information.

They all want to do it, but MS have more chance than anybody else of getting there.

Also MS have been proven, in a court of law, to have used illegal business practices in order to try and get there and to stay where they are.

I know Sony want media dominance. But Microsoft have the never-ending resources to make their vision a reality. They know how to break in and monopolise.

As Tyrion said, they also have the illegal business practices to back it up.

I don't think Sony will ever achieve total dominance as they have no real experience in computer media formats - Apple and AAC are an instant problem.

Microsoft have enerything, media formats, software, hardware, brand, money, clout, good lawyers...

And this is what you all want? Don't you know that specialization drives markets, it feeds competition, and without diversity in a marketplace, it becomes stagnant and expensive. This is a problem that is going to occur, and it's because you all buy into their crud. Sony makes a good television, Panasonic makes a solid stereo, Bose makes the best earphones, Philips makes a great DVD player, Apple's computers are so reliable it's funny, and Nintendo makes the most enjoyable and interesting consoles and games. Learn that if one company makes all of your products, you will suffer from the control they have.